[Coastal America logo]

Project Summary

Neotropical and Seabird Habitat Enhancement by Rat Eradication

Alaska Regional Map


1. Project Identification

Name Neotropical and Seabird Habitat Enhancement by Rat Eradication
Region Alaska
State Alaska
Location Eareckson Air Station, Shemya Island, AK
Date of this update March 5, 1998

2. Problem(s) addressed (check one or more)

Habitat Restoration/Protection  
 Wetlands X
 River systems
 Beaches/Dunes X
 Offshore areas
 Mangroves
Assisting Species at Risk X Neotropical Birds and Seabirds
Pollution Mitigation
 Non-Point Source Pollution
Other (describe)   Enhance nesting neotropical passerine and seabirds as well as other resident and occasional bird species through the eradication of rats. Rats were devastating bird populations since vegetation is low and only nesting on the ground or in burrows is common for most of the island. Also, the rats posed human health problem and caused damage to USAF property and supplies.

3. Project Description (100 words or less. Please include qualitative information, e.g. acres of habitat restored, miles of steam reopened to migration, and legislative authorization, e.g. WRDA, ISTEA, CWA/NEP, CZMA, etc.)

Survey the extent of rat populations and eradicate the rats through available standard methods. This was to be a demonstration project to assist in eradication efforts on other Aleutian Islands where access is more difficult. Rats were accidentally introduced to Shemya Island as well as other occupied Aleutian Islands during World War II.

4. Goals/Benefits (quantify where possible using measures of success list)

Valuable information and experience was sought for use on other Aleutian Islands within the Alaska Maritime National Wildlife Refuge. Shemya Island’s Eareckson Air Station is within the refuge. Most other islands lack the access Eareckson AS offers for the effort. The information on rat eradication would also be useful worldwide to the scientific and health community. Literature indicates 82% of all oceanic islands have been infested with rats.

Concurrent to planning and funding the project, a decision was made to draw-down the installation and supplies were moved to a newly constructed rat proof warehouse. Many buildings were abandoned and the human population of the installation decreased drastically. The heat in most buildings was turned off for a winter. As the survey prior to eradication started it was noted an absence of rats. Very few rat remains where found, that indicated the species Rattus rattus that only lives in warm environments had been present and perished. No burrows of Norway rats were found. The project was drawn to an end and funds were used to complete other natural resources Legacy Resource Management Program projects.

Was a cost-benefit study conducted for this project? yes/no If yes, provide a summary of findings.

No, successes (cost benefit) are not quantified.

5. Partners (include each participant's responsibilities - funding, permitting, etc.)

6. Funding/Contributions (organization and amount)

7. Legislative authorities used by each participant

1993 DoD Appropriations Act, USAF

8. Value added by Coastal America Partnership including Government Performance and Results Act (GPRA) goals achieved through this collaboration (500 words or less)

Incomplete, an applicable example was not available

9. Project Status

Initiation date January 1993
Completion date  
Current stage Completed

10. Contacts

11. Any additional information/comments

---

This page was last updated on Saturday, 24-Jun-2000 11:48:46 EDT
Coastal America * Coastal America Regions
Coastal America Reporters Building 300 7th Street, SW Suite 680 Washington, DC 20250
(202) 401-9928 * (202) 401-9821 (FAX)
comments to lawrencea@fas.usda.gov